View Single Post
Old 02-16-2015, 03:36 PM   #78
Xinshadow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S Ultramarine
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 132
Thanks: 68
Thanked 64 Times in 44 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
Stu, you need to chill.

You've already said that you acknowledge there is a small benefit of reducing drive shaft mass.

What you're doing now is coming off as a total fucking tool with your smarter than us attitude. With the only purpose of supporting your personal OPINION that it's not a terribly efficient mod from dollars to results. You don't get to make that decision for others.

Basically, you're a d!ck.
Ah, Stus ok. I work in cell phones, I get the same kind of rage when someone says "I need to have this serviced, I got an email forward from my gammy that says it emits radiation that will make my prostate fall out"

I get the annoyance at going on butt dyno vs hard science and numbers.

You remember that Top Gear where the Stig sets a laptime in a twingo and Clarkson says "Stig is here, I thought France made the stig violent"

Every time I see a post about lightweight driveline components and I see the term rotational inertia I think "Rotational inertia...I thought that made Stu violent"

Don't take anything on here too seriously, overall I think we can all appreciate solid reliable info backed up by numbers at the end of the day.
__________________
Current mods: OFT Stage 2 (w/93 oct), OFH, Perrin Resonated catback, DSS Aluminum Driveshaft, Perrin drop-in filter, Avo silicone inlet, Mishimoto catch can, Grimmspeed MCB, Perrin crank pulley, Nameless overpipe/downpipe combo, DBA slotted rotors, Ferrodo brake pads, goodrich SS brake lines, DOT5 synthetic brake fluid.
Xinshadow is offline   Reply With Quote