02-16-2015, 10:53 AM
|
#68
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2014
Drives: '02 RA Bugeye | '15 FRS
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,876
Thanks: 2,291
Thanked 1,488 Times in 788 Posts
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdrazic93
Originally Posted by Hawk77FT View Post
Pure physics! Try lifting a 40 or 80 pounds in 1 second and tell me which one you struggle more with?
do you even lift bro? lol
Also, explain this: in the wet with the light weight driveshaft I can easily spin the tires, with stock ones, not so much! Same conditions, same tires/wheel combo, same rpm! the coefficient for friction makes that example more complicated than just the variable of the driveshaft
The benefits of a lighter driveshaft have been over discussed for quite some time now and YES, they do make a difference! No placebo, no make believe! Considerable difference as a matter a fact! wheres your facts? links please, I'll take dyno's with a mod list from a well known tuner or a reputable company's statement they standby.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stugray
Just FAIL on so many levels.
"Also, explain this: in the wet with the light weight driveshaft I can easily spin the tires, with stock ones, not so much! Same conditions, same tires/wheel combo, same rpm!"
Absolute and utter bullshit.
.
|
CD, stu.. go easy on them! Rotational intertia change from standing stop.. coefficient of friction... fweight vs fnormal... brothers, they may not get it unless you dumb it down a little bit more. Hahah "in the wet"... get real
some real hard evidence people got logged here
|
|
|