View Single Post
Old 02-15-2015, 01:15 PM   #106
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatoni View Post
its a good point you bring up. Is losing things like a center diff worth the weight? we can speculate as fanboys one way or another but its interesting. how does it shift up to 70% of power rearward without a diff, braking?


It's basically the GKN system developed for the Evoque it seems.


http://www.prnewswire.com/news-relea...278375981.html


So basically a brake and disconnect attached directly to the transaxle. It's "sorta" a center diff but not really.


Wherever the power goes, the torque vectoring is done by the brakes up front and the diff in the rear. Sucks that they continued to use brake torque vectoring up front but hopefully that will be less of an issue since power can go to the rear now. I do wonder how long the parts in the PTU and the RDU will last though..... especially with heavy track use.


I've sure they picked this system/format for packaging more than any other consideration. They had to redesign the rear floor pan already to fit the rear bits in which is a major expense so I'm sure they limited that as much as possible.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote