[serialk11r]

Originally Posted by strat61caster

Look at the date on that article, now look at the date on the article from the Road and Track test. It's 155 horses and 148 ft-lbs, which, they got the torque wrong in the article you linked and it doesn't match the 2.0L in the current Mazdas.

http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars...zda-mx5-miata/

From the autoblog website on the 30th:
http://www.autoblog.com/2015/01/30/2...-review-video/

Just because it's newer doesn't mean it's correct. We still have not heard Mazda say it's the standard Skyactiv 2, and they would not say "we're not sure where they got that number from" for the Chicago Auto Show if it were correct. This is perfectly in line with the precedent of the MX-5 getting a slightly different engine.