View Single Post
Old 02-09-2015, 11:01 AM   #560
Malt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2015 WRX
Location: NC
Posts: 987
Thanks: 186
Thanked 624 Times in 364 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gravitylover View Post
Yup running without side markers is part of the mission. I want people to KNOW I'm there so I like to have tail lights on all the time. This car is pretty low and compared to all the trucks and overgrown suv's and livery cabs in the NY metro area anything you can do to help yourself be noticed is a good thing. In some cars tails are part of the DRL's so I thought it would be nice. Whatever, I can just run the running lights.

Yeah CA and NV are both headlights or nothing, you can't drive with running lights on or they will actually give you a ticket.
If visibility was your concern then why would you want to get rid of a federally mandated light? Side markers help with side visibility. I'm just saying that what you want makes no sense for the reasons you are saying.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Malt is offline   Reply With Quote