Quote:
Originally Posted by BuzzR
What part of, "... when I was pricing new cars last April the Mustang I looked at was 10Gs higher than the BRZ I ended up getting - and the Mustang wasn't anything special" do you not understand?
Perhaps I got a really good price on the BRZ, but that was the price difference for the car I looked at.
So why the hostility?
|
It's probably because you are making a claim that is just plain not true. Your story simply doesn't add up. You are leaving something out. FRS, BRZ, and Mustang that's "not special" are in the same price range. It's common knowledge to all of us that have shopped around for sports cars.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent 86
I don't understand why so many are dissatisfied with the "lack of HP/Tq", yet bought a twin anyway???  |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eski
maybe they thought the car had a governor mode on while test driving and would have twice as much hp as soon as they signed the deal.
|
I understand the general sentiment, but let's be clear, nobody in here is complaining. We are simply stating the truth. It doesn't mean we aren't happy with our decision, it just means we disagree that it's a "fast" car.
Besides, many of us buy the car knowing it's slow with the intention of modding to compensate. I'm planning on bumping mine up about 30whp because I think that's what will satisfy me. If stock satisfies you, great, good for you, but you don't need to be a **** about it. This thread is pointless and will just result in flaming.