Quote:
Originally Posted by ImBatman
Or if you enjoy open debate, tell me why you don't agree with my opinion by expressing your own... But bashing someone for explaining why they don't like a certain mod, trend, style, etc. is hypocritical and is just an attempt to suppress free-thinking and open, constructive discussion.
|
Let's clarify here... there has been one discussion so far that has crossed this thread. Mudflaps. statement, was "I hate them they are ugly" (Basically). discussion was "I have the OEM on my car... I like them for X reason. Or did you mean the aftermarket rally armors?" (Basically).
And That was a situation which was positive and adult and where the individuals involved showed maturity and class. Opinions were expressed and no one cared. I rather enjoyed it and almost joined in on it because I am actually into the mud flaps. OEM and Rally armor, though I want the black and not the bright "HOLD ME JESUS" red slapping you in the face. I'm in to small, tasteful mods that show personality but have minimal impact on resale. I'm into functional mods, too. Your Aero looks like shit? okay, But does that aero do wonders on a track? now we're talking.
So, keep your **** in your pants. This isn't some circle jerk. You're right. But this thread also isn't a discussion. It's a flame season. You should learn the difference or learn to leave opinions open for debate.
So here's an example with my opinion: I don't like stanced cars. I've never understood them. To me it makes it seem like you're not utilizing the tires properly and destroying what engineers spent a long time to design with the suspension travel. This being said, Is there something I am missing? I know we compared this to the Low-rider community, where they used to run small tires, wide spacers, and slow while low.
Am I safe assuming this is all for the cruise and style with no "practical application" behind the build? Just built to cruise?