View Single Post
Old 01-30-2015, 09:08 PM   #549
airjonny
Senior Member
 
airjonny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Nissan Murano
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 491
Thanks: 505
Thanked 340 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by strat61caster View Post
That's exactly what this is.

Just like "everyone" calling the Mustang a heavy pig and they add 100 lbs to the car. Mustangs will still sell and by all counts this Miata is going to be a hit as well.

I have no idea what they changed on the motor but they're rating the torque lower than the Mazda3 (and higher than the NC).

http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1...8-lb-ft-report

Edit: Sure the Mustang added some suspension and beefed up the chassis, just like the Miata added torque and shed some pounds, they've played to their strengths.
Yes I raged a bit (especially when the head engineer implied that it would at least lose weight). But I give props because they improved the complaints of the rental car interior and live axle. When they did those improvements, they caught the eye of people who wouldn't consider a Mustang before because of that. It did those things while keeping it a Mustang.

Mazda can do those things too. What is Mazda doing to get buyers who had the Miata on their list, but opted for a s2k, FRS/BRZ etc etc? What reason do I have to upgrade if I have a bulletproof NA/NB? Why should I put out the extra dough, if I can get a mega deal on a NC club and put the savings into an even performance aftermarket?

Now that doesn't mean Mazda should build a 3000 pound AWD 350hp 2+2. They can add power to the Miata formula and can still be a Miata.
airjonny is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to airjonny For This Useful Post:
themadscientist (01-30-2015)