Quote:
Originally Posted by YouShallKnow
Not sure why you need to be a jerk about it.
But since you are, let's go over how wrong you are.
That's wrong. Suspicion is not sufficient. Suspicion has to be reasonable.
You're confusing two concepts. Probable cause is for searches and arrest and is a higher standard than reasonable suspicion, which is what's required for a traffic stop or under-hood-inspection.
|
Blah Blah......Wrong!:
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark decision by the
United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment
prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest,
if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."