View Single Post
Old 01-21-2015, 09:10 AM   #8
Racecomp Engineering
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2012 Paris Di2 & 2018 STI
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 5,523
Thanks: 3,543
Thanked 7,419 Times in 3,035 Posts
Mentioned: 311 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to Racecomp Engineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shankenstein View Post
Speaking of Penske, what about their shock dyno plots would be an indicator of quality? (Penske 8100 pictured below)

What I see? Probably a dedicated track car with Optimum_G-style response.
  • The initial slopes match. Minimal jacking down and consistent response during steering inputs (low frequency inputs).
  • The adjusters make uniform changes across most of the meaningful shock velocities.
  • Compression is slightly digressive, without fully blowing off. Good compromise that won't bottom easily or generate unnecessary driver discomfort.
  • Rebound builds steadily, rather than a steep digressive response. Probably not designed for the street (but still would feel better than many coilovers).


What else should we be seeing?
Yes those things, but with Penske you can have your shock built any way you want. They'll make you a linear rebound, regressive compression shock if you ask. Or digressive on both. Whatever. And the adjusters will be perfect.

- Andy
Racecomp Engineering is offline   Reply With Quote