Quote:
Originally Posted by torqdork
The potential conflict between OEM and aftermarket that I've seen based on science show that the rollover protection provided by the OEM windshield is proven while I've yet to see rollover tests of aftermarket glass.
|
So, in other words, you have seen nothing to indicate that any particular aftermarket glass brand is inferior to OEM.
Meanwhile, the companies that make OEM glass also manufacture aftermarket glass in the same factories under the same quality control system. So as long as you select a reputable brand of glass, there's no reason to believe that it is structurally inferior to OEM. If you were talking about that cheap Chinese glass that gets installed in the $90 place next to the junk yard, you might have a point. But not if you're using a reputable dealer.
I live in a state that does not force insurance companies to replace windshields, so if you file a claim here, it can increase your premium. I have a $500 deductible. If I can get OE equivalent glass from a reputable manufacturer for $420 (which is what I did), I not only save $80 out of pocket, but I also don't have my premium go up at the next policy date. Getting OEM glass installed would be $600 to $700. If I file a claim and insist on OEM, I end up paying more out of pocket to "save" the $100 to $200 the insurance company would pay, which they would get back starting with the next premium.
It's simply just not worth it for some vague, unsupported claim that aftermarket glass is inferior. Show me some actual evidence that Pilkington, Carlite or ApTech (which are all OEM manufacturers as well as aftermarket) makes inferior glass for the secondary market, and I might reconsider.