View Single Post
Old 01-07-2015, 07:09 AM   #299
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,994 Times in 2,984 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
@steve99 I've had a look through my logs after re-reading the post about PEKC. I can see nothing to suggest that the ECU is retarding a different value to the FBKC values set, which is what the guys on Romraider were seeing. I have a few logs where the FBKC retard value are set to -0.7 and -1.05 and at no point does the retard value change from that.


Maybe setting the FBKC to retard a daft value like -2 degrees and then if it retards less then you know we have the PEKC tables, however I believe that the transient retard tables are there to overcome the issue that was there on the older ECUs.
you likely correct

what got me curious was a -2 flkc correction in one of my logs. just one -2 only for one tenth of a second fbkc. usually you get a few hits in the log at 10hz refresh and the max i got anywhere else was 0.6 . was probabably a logging glitch.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote