View Single Post
Old 12-23-2014, 03:34 PM   #27
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,998 Times in 2,985 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mid_life_crisis View Post
@steve99
I'm figuring that you can't change the number of rows. The existing ones must be manipulated.
I'm assuming that the ECU extrapolates for values in between those listed in the tables.
If you are trying to increase the effective rev limit, not talking about the soft limit yet, should you change all the tables that have an rpm scale so they all use the same scale? This seems reasonable, because what good is a timing table that goes to 7600 without a fuel table to match?
The rpm scale goes in 400 rpm increments until it is almost at the limit, when it changes to 200. The very lowest are also 200. For example, they seem to be
800, 1000, 1200, 1600....6400, 6800, 7000, 7200, 7400.
If you wanted to raise the limit to 7600, should every table be changed to something like this along the rpm scale?
800, 1000, 1200, 1600....6400, 6800, 7200, 7400, 7600.
Correcting the associated values if they are different, of course.
+1 on what @Kodename47 says plus after the max values in a table is exceeded then i believe ecu just continues to use same values is if the last rpm row was 7600 and you revved to 7800 then it would just continue to use the values from 7600.

If it between rows ie row at 1200 rpm then 1600 rpm and you at 1400 rpm it appears the ecu uses a value that appears to be the average of the 1200 and 1600 values. for timing or fueling ect.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote