View Single Post
Old 12-09-2014, 10:09 AM   #1384
ATL BRZ
TEQSPORT Brand Manager
 
ATL BRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: '24 GR86 + '16 FR-S
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,666
Thanks: 3,725
Thanked 4,137 Times in 1,707 Posts
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Tut View Post
Interesting that the peak torque between your E85 tune and a bone stock tune was so close. If a stock car made 167 whp on that dyno, then I don't think the correction factor to a Dynojet is nearly as high as they think. That would put that stock tuned car at 188 whp on a Dynojet which seems very high to me as most gains are from a tune.
Yep. From what I understand after a brief explanation from the owner, Mustangs measure torque and calculate horsepower. Dynojets measure horsepower and calculate torque.
@Bg8780 's car recently was recently EcuTek tuned by TSM and made 190whp on 93 with a header and 2.5" headerback on the same Dynojet my car made 195whp on back in April with E85 and stock front/mid pipe. On the Mustang dyno on Sunday his car made 167whp/132wtq with the same 93 tune and mods. Mind blown.
ATL BRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ATL BRZ For This Useful Post:
Xero-Limit (12-15-2014)