View Single Post
Old 11-20-2014, 03:56 PM   #1029
torqdork
Senior Member
 
torqdork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: RV-7
Location: Out West
Posts: 1,818
Thanks: 1,042
Thanked 893 Times in 562 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superhatch View Post
My thoughts on going back to V8's.

- Reducing costs means not changing engines and aero packages for those engines every year.
- F1 is supposed to be the pinnacle of racing, but also the pinnacle of technology. If we go back to non-hybrid V8s the Ford CMax will have more advanced technology than an F1 motor.
- The fans HATED the V8s at first too. Switching back after one year seems like a knee jerk reaction that is appeasing 10% of the crowd.
- Rather than putting V8s back in, why not focus on BOP and make the field more competitive. Fans will flock to great racing, not great noise.
If they pursue the pinnacle of technology to it's logical conclusion, we'd soon have hydrogen fuel cell power units in F1. No hydrocarbons, no pollution, just water vapor with no sound except maybe a tea kettle whistle.

Of course nobody wants that, either. I vote a return to hydrocarbon engines with displacement limited by rule depending on n/a or t/sc, let teams play with cylinder configuration and layout.
torqdork is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to torqdork For This Useful Post:
alxtheoreo (11-20-2014), strat61caster (11-20-2014)