Thread: OFT vs ECUFlash
View Single Post
Old 11-14-2014, 03:05 AM   #22
ztan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 311
Thanks: 44
Thanked 360 Times in 144 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
You can use either device, I use Tactrix. Decision was mainly based on the fact that I was able to define (with RomRaider guys and Td-d's help) RAM logging addresses for my ROM before OFT had support for them, and I can apply whatever scaling I want to the parameters being logged.

I get logging of multiple parameters at 20-40Hz with Tactrix and process my logfiles in a batch quickly with MatLab.

For hacking the ROM, either device pulls a ROM file that you can hack. If you're interested in poking through this with IDA, I have traced a few things in the ROM - a lot of indirectly referenced info is quite hard to find (for me). KPIT GNU tools are also useful for seeing how the Renesas chips process the indirectly referenced code.
ztan is offline   Reply With Quote