View Single Post
Old 05-04-2012, 11:02 PM   #288
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaceywilly View Post
Yes load in that case refers to cornering load. More downforce on the tire would shift this whole curve upwards, but not in a linear way.
I don't think so. Vertical load is vertical load. It doesn't matter if it's generated by weight transfer or by wings.

In the 500/700 lbs example the Cf is 1.4

Adding downforce to get the 2000/1500 lbs example the Cf is .75

It is an ultimate gain in traction, but the Cf still decreases. They talk about it as a tire's efficiency.

Remember cornering g is based on the available traction (second number) over vehicle weight.

So in the first case the car has 2800 lbs of available traction. If it is properly balanced 50/50 a 2800 lbs car will corner at 1.0g.

With the (ridiculous amount) downforce, even with the decreasing Cf, we still have 6000 lbs of traction and the same 2800 lbs car would corner at ~2.14g
__________________


Because titanium.
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote