05-04-2012, 01:33 PM
|
#135
|
|
First86 / boat thief
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: MKIV Supra
Location: OKC
Posts: 306
Thanks: 147
Thanked 119 Times in 43 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatoni
its convienient to choose when you are an elitest.
|
Never said I was an elitist just the opposite I have mentioned several times I have 2 FWD cars currently.
Both Porsche and BMW have used macphersons and 4 cylinders fairly effectively but they don’t seem real fond of FWD. Come to think of it I know of no FWD supercars and I can’t think of any FWD GT cars or sports cars.
So Honda if fairly well known for FWD so Y is the S2000 RWD or how about the NSX..
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatoni
fwd will be a combination of lighter, cheaper, and more power to the wheels.
|
The vast majority of mass produced very lightweight performance cars are RWD, MX5, MR2, Lotus, ect.
Cheaper depends on the manufacture and what they have in the parts bin. But ya normaly
More power to the wheels I don’t see how you think that, But certainly not more power to the road and that’s what matters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatoni
sure fwd has a lower performance cieling
|
Look I am not saying anything everybody doesn’t already know FWD dose sucks for performance driving, you know it you just don’t like that I said it.
|
|
|