Quote:
Originally Posted by Shutter
There are things that this article point out that really help to verify that they are true because you can see that they say things that are said. I mean, its great to have "random quote" or citing a source that "said some other stuff too". It really is quite political of them to say so much and say nothing at all. Isn't it amazing?
Thats what that article was. Saying a bunch of stuff and saying nothing at all.
You walk away thinking, "WTF. This article LITERALLY said nothing."
|
Reminds me of when people would render iPhone concepts, and sites would write an article discussing how they felt about changes that a random third party had theorized. And they'd criticize Apple for design features, despite it being something a dude made up in Autocad.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk