Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultramaroon
It's not funny. It's true. Putting a smiley face on it doesn't change that.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chen
I am... An overweight fwd hatch (that screams tc) is nothing compared to the twins. Please humor me as how you think the 7th gen is comparable.
|
Looks like others have already educated both of you on the facts. It's amazing people can think they are experts on cars they know nothing about. Your comments are as if you have never even seen a 7th gen Celica let alone driven or sat in one. They look NOTHING alike. That Celica was a direct competitor to the pre-RSX Integra. The idea that an Integra or Celica are competitors with the TC is nuts.
Curb Weight (lbs)
2014 TC: 3082 (6-speed)
2001 Celica: 2425
2000 Integra: 2703
2013 FRS: 2758
You're only off by 650lbs+ calling the Celica fat. Which one is closer to the TC's weight again??
Exterior Measurements
TC:
WIDTH (70.7 in.) HEIGHT (55.7 in.) LENGTH (176.6 in.) FRONT TRACK (60.6 in.) REAR TRACK (61.4 in.) WHEEL BASE (106.3 in.)
Celica:
WIDTH (68.3 in.) HEIGHT (51.4 in.) LENGTH (170.5 in.) FRONT TRACK (58.7 in.) REAR TRACK (58.3 in.) WHEEL BASE (102.4 in.)
Integra:
WIDTH (67.3 in.) HEIGHT (52.6 in.) LENGTH (172.4 in.) FRONT TRACK (58.1 in.) REAR TRACK (57.8 in.) WHEEL BASE (101.2 in.)
FRS:
WIDTH (69.9 in.) HEIGHT (50.6 in.) LENGTH (166.7 in.) FRONT TRACK (59.8 in.) REAR TRACK (60.6 in.) WHEEL BASE (101.2 in.)
Total volume (cubic inches)
2014 TC: 695,449.034
2001 Celica: 598,560.71
2000 Integra: 610,292.552
2013 FRS: 589,607.898
So is the Celica closer to the FRS or TC in size??