View Single Post
Old 04-30-2012, 06:55 PM   #50
lpnnlp
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: whatever
Location: wherever
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbowned View Post
And power, and speed, and $1,100 from your wallet. It's fine, really! I should be thanking you for choosing the auto. Like I said before, 20 years from now when the enthusiasts have run all the manual cars into the ground, there will be plenty of clean, unmolested auto cars left for people to snatch up and do manual conversions to. If we're even driving gas-powered cars 20 years from now at the rate we're going
We don't know yet the drivetrain efficiency of the AT, but given that it locks early on, the dyno results could be similar. We will have to wait on that.

When you say "speed," you mean 0-60? If so, the slightly taller gear ratio might get the AT to true 60 mph without shifting to 3rd, so any advantage that the MT has could be negated in a 0-60 test. We will have to wait on that one too.
lpnnlp is offline   Reply With Quote