View Single Post
Old 09-26-2014, 10:45 AM   #19
Circuit Motorsports
Senior Member
 
Circuit Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 4,353
Thanks: 294
Thanked 495 Times in 259 Posts
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Circuit Motorsports
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fizz View Post
@Circuit Motorsports I asked in the other tracking/autocross thread but figured here would be more appropriate.....are the gains shown above from the rally car's dyno typical of what can be expected with the nameless header & tune (plus other exhaust bits)??

That's a very impressive gain there especially the torque. Would that tune be applicable to a daily street driven car with same header?
I really don't have enough data on the nameless header to declare these results typical. The Nameless Performance dyno charts do show massive torque gains in the same area and seem to support the results.

The exhaust on the rally car is not typical of a street driven car in that the exhaust is only the header with a straight pipe -- nearly 0 restrictions. As restrictions in the exhaust are added, I would expect the gains to reduce a bit, but I believe you can still expect a huge torque gain right in the stock torque dip area, and the general torque and power curves to be similar.

My tune with this header would absolutely be applicable to a daily driven street car.

- Bob
Circuit Motorsports is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Circuit Motorsports For This Useful Post:
Fizz (09-26-2014)