View Single Post
Old 04-30-2012, 03:39 PM   #29
86fanatic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: auto
Location: us
Posts: 243
Thanks: 5
Thanked 43 Times in 19 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I think some of you guys are missing the point. The car was not meant to be competitive in motorsports. If you are worried about a few tenths difference in the 0-60 times between the auto and manual, why are you even considering the car at all? You can get a much faster 0-60 time for about the same price in a different car, Mustang, Cooper S, etc.

Plenty of reviews have stated that the auto is a great application for the track. It down shifts when you expect before corners, and it has a very smooth operation. Yes, it won't be as fast around the course as a manual, but then again that isn't the point of the car anyway.

Anyway I disagree that the auto is only a valid option for the commuters and people who just want to hold their girlfriend's hands while eating a hamburger.

For me, shifting is a mechanical chore. It doesn't make me feel more connected to the car, it's simply a task I have to perform over and over to extract the right amount of power from the car. Driving a modern performance oriented automatic or DCT, and I was instantly converted. I understand shifting makes some people feel more connected to the car, but for me, it's a chore especially when we have the technology to do it better then humans.

That said I'm glad there the option for both, but I don't think you guys should be framing it as one is the "right" choice over the other, especially based on 0-60 times.
86fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to 86fanatic For This Useful Post:
@Art_Mighty (09-22-2012), Dadhawk (04-30-2012), mizzta21 (01-26-2015), Ocala FR-S (08-31-2014), ragnarokfps (03-27-2018), russv (05-01-2012), sgtcarrot (03-28-2018), SuperDave (09-23-2012), Sutty (09-23-2012), TofuJoe (08-09-2015), twitism (09-23-2012)