Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Freddy
I'm not missing anything but you seem to be.
1) Valid point that I had already considered.
2) The stock cat-back isn't very restrictive at all. The most restrictive part of our exhaust is the front half and I have the dyno results to prove this.
3) The difference between 93 and 94 octane isn't much really. 105 octane e85 is a different story.
4) The dyno should compensate for the altitude difference but if not, it hardly explains why your result would be higher when it should be lower.
Think for a moment. 227 whp and 204 wtq from an early ESC setup running pump gas, stock exhaust and and BRZedit tune? Does that honestly makes sense to you when the same car only makes 200/175 on a Dynojet?
|
I didnt make 227.
I made 206 on the DynoDynamics(in fall) and 202 on a dynojet(in summer)?