Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Freddy
Even in this glass house?
So maybe it isn't "realistically accurate" to compare the highest ever Phantom dyno results, obtained after hours of custom tuning, to low-end, canned-tune Innovate stage 1 results from a different car on a different dyno in different weather and make assumptions based on this inaccurate comparison?
I could agree with that.
|
While I agree comparing dynos isn't a true judge of performnace... we all do it, and in most cases it is the only way to draw ANY conclusions, so I am okay with your comparison.
The main difference between the dynos in my opinion is the fact they are different brands. Dyno dynamics read low...very similar to mustangs. On a dyno dynamics I got 167hp with ecutek stage 1. Other cars were getting 155 to 160 stock.... And theses were MTs. Its pretty easy for a AT to get ten HP less that a MT....I figure in ptunings dyno a AT would get around 150hp....still looking for proof on that one though.
As far as my highest results....I'm running the same tune of everyone else....and shivs OTS tune is stronger than the custom tune that I got from BRZedit.
Looking forward to @
Shiv@Openflash to try out the new tq300 that I have. Double the boost at redline makes a big difference when it's non parasitic.