View Single Post
Old 08-05-2014, 09:14 PM   #9
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,998 Times in 2,985 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyota John View Post
So the only down side that I can think of would be that if the Knock Correction table values are larger than the standard table and the IAM drops it will pull a higher percentage out of the final ignition value out reducing performance more quickly. The opposite would be true if there is not enough Knock Correction value than the IAM might not have enough or be to slow to pull timing out if severe knocking happens.
AFAIK the values in the Knock correction table become you KCA or KC LEARNED value, this is the amount of correction the ecu has to play with to correct knock both fbkc and flkc and IAM. I also believe that if the value in the knock correction table is less than about 3 coarse correction ie fbkc is disabled and iam will not drop, but you still have knock.

Remember you logging the ecu attempt to correct knock, not the ectual knock itself.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote