Thread: Pure Price
View Single Post
Old 07-29-2014, 11:13 AM   #58
MokSpeed
Granny Shifter
 
MokSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 2014 FR-S
Location: United States
Posts: 2,094
Thanks: 539
Thanked 1,289 Times in 711 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxBrun0xx View Post
This has literally nothing to do with the WRX. At all. A similarly equipped WRX will cost you over $30k. I built a WRX with similar equipment on their website for shits and giggles and it was $33k. I think the real issue is that Subaru dealerships are a lot less common in warmer areas. Subaru has trained its customers to think they need AWD. Trying to convince people in areas that get a lot of snow that they should get a low, RWD coupe over a WRX can't be very easy. The dealership I bought mine from told me the reason the car was so cheap was because they just couldn't sell BRZ's in February. I believe it.

Also, yes, the FRS front grill is pretty, but the BRZ comes with a lot more stuff than the base model FRS. So for the same money, no reason not to get the Subie. Oh, and it'll also hold it's value better because they're "rarer". Go figure.
This has everything to do with the WRX. Going along with your argument, a base WRX starts around $26,300 while a BRZ premium starts at around $25,600 and this is without TT&L or any additions. Given that small price gap, a consumer who doesn't give a shit about fancy interior features like myself would consider a faster car with AWD the better purchase. Because of this reason, they had to make a noticeable price gap between an equally equipped WRX with the same options as a BRZ limited in order to actually sell BRZs. You basically proved my point with your entire post.
MokSpeed is offline   Reply With Quote