View Single Post
Old 07-17-2014, 05:58 PM   #47
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by eikond View Post
Dave: Where did you read that WRX 4-pots suck? Have you tried them? I've read one review on this forum where the guy said he loved them. Where did you hear that they move the bias toward the rear?

Piston area is smaller, which means less brake torque at a given pressure (which with no other changes is constant for our purposes). That means that given the same rear setup in both cases, bias will shift towards the back. I meant suck for this (and the WRX) application, not that they suck for any other reason (ie, high flex, crap seals, poor construction, et cetera).

Quote:
Originally Posted by eikond View Post
Here's my math:
The stock BRZ calipers have 48mm pistons
if my high school geometry is correct, that would make for a radius of 24mm. Pi x R ^2 = 1810 x 2 pistons = 3620

The Z32 calipers have 40.45mm pistons
same math gets me 1282 x 4 pistons = 5127

It actually doesn't work like that for piston area on a slider. You measure only one side of both calipers. If you want to measure both, you'd just double the OEM ones (so 7,240 based on your math for the WRX calipers).

Quote:
Originally Posted by eikond View Post
So, in theory the Z32 caliper should inpute more clamping force right? So I'm not sure why that would result in moving the brake bias toward the rear?

Again, i'm not a physics expert..

Based on the correction above, the piston area is actually smaller than stock, so it'll shift towards the rear if all else is equal. Until now all the comments I said about shifting towards the rear was directed at the WRX calipers as I didn't bother to lookup the Z32 ones. Given the better leverage though it could be a wash (leverage = further from the hub, no different then using a longer lever to apply torque to a bolt vs a shorter lever)

Quote:
Originally Posted by eikond View Post
One thing I noticed is that the Z32 pads are slightly smaller surface area than the BRZ stock pads. I don't know how much smaller though.
Does a larger pad surface area increase stopping ability? It seems logical that it would.. but I'm not sure about that.


Swept area does have an effect combined with pressure and piston area as well as leverage. However, brake force by itself isn't the issue (OEM calipers have PLENTY - they can lock up R compounds so an increase is force is simply not needed). A potential change in brake bias can lengthen braking distances due to easier lockup (more ABS intervention). This assumes Subaru did the job correctly and optimized the bias as well as they could, which isn't a sure bet given the parts bin nature but clearly they tried (hence the LGT rears with the WRX fronts vs all LGT or all WRX, etc). Prop valve/abs pump/etc play a roll in that tuning as well so we should assume that it's at least pretty good from the factory.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote