View Single Post
Old 07-10-2014, 10:06 AM   #5
Racecomp Engineering
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2012 Paris Di2 & 2018 STI
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 5,522
Thanks: 3,542
Thanked 7,419 Times in 3,035 Posts
Mentioned: 311 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to Racecomp Engineering
Two things I'll mention:

1. Good work!

2. There's more to understeer/oversteer balance than just the main spring rates. This car is very bumpstop active, so lowering an inch up front with soft rates means you're getting a LOT of spring rate from the bumpstop itself. So the rates on the springs are almost secondary once you're in a corner and the body is rolling...the spring rate of the stock bumpstops gets progressively very firm. So lowering 1 inch with the same spring rates as stock will definitely change the handling (and ride) of the car. Even lowering with the same % increase in rate front and rear can change balance. Maybe simply

Suspension geometry is also a factor and you did note this fact in the spreadsheet.. Lowering an inch up front has a different effect on geometry than lowering an inch in the rear. Maybe mention the bumpstop thing too and/or change the wording (the 2 examples especially...putting a number on how much % more/less understeer there is than stock is very tricky). You could say the change the spring rate bias X% or something.

I would also note which springs include replacement bumpstops (our RCE springs and Eibach).

- Andy
Racecomp Engineering is offline   Reply With Quote