07-10-2014, 06:03 AM
|
#86
|
|
That Guy
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaDDeS
Indeed you are not, the dynapack itself absorbs energy and you still measure the power after the kinematic chain ... its not a "engine dyno", the gearbox dissipates energy by friction, the prop shaft does, the diff does ... the bearings do, all that kinematic chain from the flywheel to the rear wheels hub dissipates energy in frictions ... and that usually is accepted to be up to 16% itself.
so losses + dynapack loss = that number.
Yes it could be corrected, ajusted so it looks "better" but whoever knows about Dynos, and a given car has been "dynapacked" knows that the raw result will be lower than other solutions. Once again, when you tune a car, the Delta is important, not the absolute raw number ...
|
A dynapack will read lower than an engine dyno but typically higher then a chassis dyno.
|
|
|