View Single Post
Old 07-06-2014, 02:09 AM   #48
fenton
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,086
Thanks: 526
Thanked 1,614 Times in 726 Posts
Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAEMANO View Post
Wow @fenton you were right when saying the TQ250 spools faster and has really closed the gap on the TQ300. I compared your first TQ250 and TQ300 runs and the logs bear out how quickly the TQ250 gets up and on boost. Tried to get the pulls as "apples to apples" as I could from your logs starting both at 2692 RPM (TQ250) and 2691 RPM (TQ300).

Data is here (fascinating):
http://datazap.me/sites/default/file...20070514_0.csv

Graph is here:
http://datazap.me/u/daemano/phantom-...4&mark=28-0-99

Did you line then up when they both went full throttle though? Because I think the 300 did actually go wot until a little bit after.
fenton is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fenton For This Useful Post:
DAEMANO (07-06-2014)