Quote:
Originally Posted by Wait4BRZ_STI?
Another thoughts on Rx-8 vs BRZ comparison.
Since the price of BRZ is out, we can take a quick comparison
2009 Rx-8: $27590
2013 BRZ: $26270
These two cars are within 2K from each other. Granted that BRZ has better interior/exterior equipments. However, Rx-8 is more powerful and is a true 4 seater. Moreover, the sales of Rx-8 were so poor in the late years you can probably get a higher-spec Rx-8 at the same price at the limited BRZ. As a result, there is virtually no difference (or at most 2K difference) between Rx-8 and BRZ from the price perspective.
My point is that BRZ/FRS is supposed to be a bargain sports car that is much less expensive than s2000, 370Z and Rx-8. But in the end, we get a price that is comparable to the Rx-8. This is perfectly fine with me since BRZ still represents a very good value and is the only true sports coupe in the market (miata is a convertible).
However, one cannot help but wonder what is the differentiating factor that makes the sales of BRZ seem so successful but the sales of RX-8 so miserable.
For me, the eccentricity of a rotary engine is probably what kills the sales of RX-8. Marketing prowess is probably another reason to the success of BRZ/FRS.
|
I don't know if I would agree about the interior of the BRZ. I have been in the interior of the BRZ and I think the RX-8 interior is of much better quality / use of materials. For once, the visor/mirror is not that high quality and there are some other differences that can be mentioned. However, I don't think that takes away from the driving ability of the BRZ.
As for the poor RX-8 sales, my guess would be that early engine issues plagued the car and steered people clear from the RX-8 and its MPG. But as a used car and insurance discount as a "sedan," it is still a good deal. Even though it does have more power, it comes in heavier than the BRZ.
But it still would be interesting to pit the two cars against each other.