View Single Post
Old 07-01-2014, 01:09 AM   #185
eric6
Senior Member
 
eric6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 93 MR2 Turbo; 2014 BRZ
Location: United States
Posts: 328
Thanks: 143
Thanked 492 Times in 193 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gramicci101 View Post
That looks great, Eric. Are vanes 1 and 8 spaced further apart than 2-6 for aero reasons? What would happen if the vanes were angled at all? It would probably increase drag a bit, but could it help direct airflow?
Those were moved outward more than the others because they covered the mounting hole if they were kept at the same spacing.

The whole premise behind our idea was to speed up airflow. By speeding up airflow, you create a low pressure zone (pressure and velocity are inversely proportionate). Low pressure equals downforce. Paul came up with this specific airfoil design to keep drag to a minimum while promoting high velocities.

So, to answer your question, we did not angle them in the tests. It went against our thought process as angling them would slow down the air. This would direct the airflow though, possibly reducing drag, but also probably reducing down force. This would also have added another multitude of tests, each of which take a lot of time (over a day to run, then analyse, then change, then run again).

Aerodynamics takes quite a bit of intuition or you can sit their for weeks scratching your head asking what you are doing wrong (been there, done that lol). Their will always be room for improvement, but at some point they become diminishing returns for the days and hours put into it.
eric6 is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to eric6 For This Useful Post:
civicdrivr (07-01-2014), gramicci101 (07-01-2014), Wonderbar (07-01-2014)