View Single Post
Old 06-28-2014, 02:26 AM   #38
86-tundra
Troll Hunter
 
86-tundra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: fr-s, tundra
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,424
Thanks: 1,695
Thanked 922 Times in 470 Posts
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by P86RAVES View Post
Not all cars lose value so fast; you know, that whole "resell value" thing.

For example, a new WRX will cost you less than a used one from last year. Those cars just don't depreciate much.

A $100K AMG Merc from 2003, you can get one for around $20k now if I'm not mistaken.

While the circle jerk ensuing is fun, it can realistically be expected certain cars values will not fall as much as they do. Perhaps getting car made by Subaru and Toyota, two brands with very good resell value, led OP to believe this.

Relative links:

Least depreciated: http://jalopnik.com/the-ten-least-de...ears-215315708

Most depreciated: http://jalopnik.com/5982789/the-most...past-ten-years
least depreciated should not include collector cars.. that's stupid.

actually, the whole article sucks. What are the metrics to which this is held by? Saying an R8 has 0% deprecation means nothing. If my R8 had 40k miles on it, I sure as hell bet it doesn't have 0% deprecation
__________________
86-tundra is offline   Reply With Quote