|
Although datalogs are plentiful, and we get offers (that we turn down) from customers to look at so and so's datalog, perhaps it would be best to not assume what tuner x does compared to tuner y. I think with time we see one move a step forward but then this equation changes as we all focus on different portions of the performance envelope, and are presented with different mods on different cars. Just because you may see a certain DI/PI ratio in one datalog, really has no bearing on the multitude of variations that have been tried. Some folks here have had multiple revisions over time and have seen the progress first hand. Others jumped ship early on and swear by one tune or another, which discredits the progress that has been made.
In reference to the DI aspect, lets not cloud the reality with tuning philosophy. It is an injector. It fires for a certain time, with a certain pressure. With EcuTek RaceROM there is no limitation with that aside from physics. This is not unique to any tuner. What is unique is how we implement it. Nothing to patent or copyright, just preference. We all put our name to the tunes and their reliability, and if we think that a certain combination will deliver the best longevity and performance, that is what we go with. Doesn't mean that there haven't been things that don't work for everyone--no tuner is immune to that.
What I can say with absolute certainty having invested heavily in this platform last year, is that it has come a very long way from then, and even the last few months. There really is much to learn for everyone. If that weren't the case you wouldn't be seeing a new revision monthly.
|