View Single Post
Old 06-02-2014, 11:10 PM   #15
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,671
Thanks: 1,437
Thanked 4,011 Times in 2,097 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
same spring rates all around makes zero sense when front motion ratio is ~.95 and rear motion ratio is ~.75. Stiffer rear springs are appropriate to give similar stiffness vs. weight front and rear. 6kg all around gives ~303 lb/in wheel rate up front, 189 lb/in in back. Totally mismatched.

I LOVE the Ohlins DFV dampers on my FD, but there as well, same 11kg/mm spring rates all around was not the way to go given ~.65 front motion ratio and ~.70 rear motion ratio. In that case, stiffer front springs are called for. I'll be swapping the fronts for 13kg/mm soon, as I had to disconnect the rear swaybar with the standard "square" spring rates.

I think they spend every ounce of their efforts on damping, which they do BRILLIANTLY, but then somehow space on spring rates and just stick the same rates up front and in back regardless of the motion ratios. Puzzling to me...
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ZDan For This Useful Post:
Black Tire (11-01-2014), CSG David (06-03-2014), diss7 (06-03-2014), ultra (12-13-2015), why? (10-11-2016)