Thread: Frs vs s2000
View Single Post
Old 05-11-2014, 10:45 PM   #1210
chrisl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2006 Cayman S, 2007 Outback 2.5i
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,116
Thanks: 116
Thanked 455 Times in 303 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
You're agreeing with me.

The Parachute (high Cd, low A) has less CdA than a 787 (ultra low Cd, high A), and the 787 is more aerodynamic (Cd).
Maybe I misread your post then - I interpreted your statement as saying that the Cd alone doesn't determine whether an object is aerodynamic, which is what I was disagreeing with. I do agree fully with your statement here (that the small parachute has a smaller CdA than the 787, but is less aerodynamic).
chrisl is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to chrisl For This Useful Post:
CSG Mike (05-11-2014)