Quote:
Originally Posted by suaveflooder
I can sum your posts up in one word: "troll"
Guess what the griffon doesn't have? (Pointless aero)
And guess what they got rid of (weight)
It's been fun, "dude,". But I am done feeding you 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
I'm no troll
-I saw that you were writing the 1.0 off because of it's bodykit.
-I told you it's fine that you don't like it, just don't piss on other people who like it.
-You continued on, saying that the "useless bodykit" adds weight
-I told you that a lot of things add weight, and getting all bent out of shape just because less than 100lbs (arguably less than 50lbs) was added is basically pointless
-You then go on to complain about Toyota's support for the FR-S/86. You say it has been a joke, and they ultimately failed. You praised the aftermarket for stepping up.
-I point out that TRD support for the FR-S/86 has been great, citing the Griffon car as evidence of their developments.
-You call me a troll, and say the Griffon apparently doesn't count because it's has a gutted interior and functional aerodynamics.
We were(are?) debating. I came into thins knowing I would never convince you to like it. I was merely discussing the topic. I never once insulted you. I merely disagreed.
If you would like to continue I'll point this out.
True the Griffon has Aero, and a gutted interior, but it's still a TRD vehicle. And I think it's credible evidence that TRD supports and is developing for the FR-S/86, therefore negating your claim that TRD is a "Joke."
Just because the RS 1.0 isn't a factory-built track monster doesn't mean it's pointless. I pointed it out earlier that some people don't go to track days, or care about going faster. Some just like cruising.
also it occurred to me,
How do we know the aero isn't functional? I can't find any records of a wind tunnel test.
so in reality, that claim is unproven until some tests can be done.