Quote:
Originally Posted by suaveflooder
I can sum your posts up in one word: "troll"
Guess what the griffon doesn't have? (Pointless aero)
And guess what they got rid of (weight)
It's been fun, "dude,". But I am done feeding you 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Sorry to jump in, but I've been following you two's convo, and I have this question about something. When you say that the TRD aero is pointless, is there any evidence that it's purely cosmetic? is it really not good for anything at all aside from looks and weight? because I like to argue with you on the fact that it's not pointless, that it has function. I can't make the argument that it's something in your face speed or lightness or anything but just the normal better airflow etc, I need to research about this alittle more to get super technical. But I like to think that Toyota when they made the TRD aero they tested it and it wasn't pointless. I can't speak about the USD copy, I don't even think the quads are the same thing, but I know for a fact Toyota spends time researching and testing for example the NUR kit was in fact tested in Germany.
So just for knowledge at least for me, mind telling me why the TRD kit is pointless? because I've been following this car since it's conception on paper, and I know for a fact they tested the TRD kit several times, I'm speaking for the Japanese part they based it on. It's differences are very minimal to what is one the RS1.0.
Why is the aero on the Yellow car pointless? Thanks.
Respectfully,
Zaku