Thread: WRX -> FR-S?
View Single Post
Old 05-06-2014, 09:43 AM   #47
blackhawkdown
Senior Member
 
blackhawkdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: 2012 WRX, 2003 RSX Type S
Location: TN, AK, VA, S. Korea, NC
Posts: 451
Thanks: 12
Thanked 284 Times in 154 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave77 View Post
I used to live in colorado, and honestly I would not drive a rwd car if I was still there.

I had a 2006 STI a few years ago, and the engine and acceleration was awesome, all stock. My FR-S is WAY slower, but basically I'm pepping it up to make it drive more how I like it. (Lightwieght drivetrain parts for now, maybe a basic tune.) You'll feel after a few months that Toyota/Subaru were such pussies when they tuned this car. So if you aren't SURE you want the FRS and know EXACTLY what it's about, you might end up getting rid of it pretty soon also.

My STI always pissed me off though b/c it had 300bhp and it couldn't slide around turns, and it had crazy understeer past the limit. I had a 2001 S4 before that with even worse understeer.

So I needed a car like the FRS without understeer. I'd never get it if I lived in a snowy place. But other people said the aids really help a lot so maybe it could work.
we have alaska drivers up here with studded tires. it works great with studded tires. its not so bad on blizzaks. you will be suprised what people drive up here. take it with a grain of salt as these cars I have seen are only on city streets. Now my WRX with Blizzaks in the country side , i have no problem.
blackhawkdown is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to blackhawkdown For This Useful Post:
dave77 (05-06-2014)