View Single Post
Old 05-02-2014, 01:44 AM   #90
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 791 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I'm starting to like the squiggly lines. lol Also I've found that it is better to put the smoothed curve somewhere between the current and corrected curves otherwise you will likely overshoot the adjustment. After several hours of logging and 4 different MAF scales I think I've gotten the CL fuel trims to where I like. +- 2% with it being in the negative more of the time than positive. Next I will work on the timing advance.

Also, has anyone else noticed that there seems to be too much compensation for temps in the fueling? In hotter temps fuel trim will go up and when in colder temps computer will start trimming back the fuel, I've noticed while doing a large amount of logging to get the MAF scale dialed in.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote