View Single Post
Old 04-26-2014, 12:53 AM   #61
Jegan_V
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2023 Subaru BRZ
Location: Toronto
Posts: 433
Thanks: 67
Thanked 275 Times in 156 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zozr View Post
No, it's really not.

I don't know why everyones getting a little butt hurt considering a ton of twin owners agree and it's the reason so many are adding power.

Truth is the car IS a little underpowered. Now that Nissan says it they're "mad".

I get it's fun in the corners but you're getting beat by a Sienna mini van off the line lol, in a sports car.
Sports car does not automatically mean fast nor powerful. Many sports cars in the past have not been speed demons and given there's a high chance contemporary sedans could best them in a drag race. The Triumph TR cars were never fast, but they're definitely sports cars. The Fiat X1/9 or original Toyota MR2, they're sports cars but their engines have economy car origins and as a result they're not hugely fast. The twins fall in the same category, they're not particularly fast relative to even some mainstream cars but they were designed to be light weight, nimble with the intention of being capable of taking on motorsports events.

That said with the example you've given. The Sienna at best is capable of a 0-60 of 7.5 seconds, most say its 7.9 seconds. That is a very competitive time for a AT FRS/BRZ where its fuel economy gearing does put it in that position. The MT FRS/BRZ though, they're often quoted near the 6.5 second range. It will beat the Sienna, but that's not enough to take on a V6 Camry. That said, the Camaro V6 also struggles to defeat a V6 Camry.
Jegan_V is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jegan_V For This Useful Post:
humfrz (04-26-2014)