View Single Post
Old 04-25-2014, 10:52 PM   #92
Mixlplix
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Earth
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLS8520 View Post
Can you please explain why a stiffer bolt setup/more rigid suspension/reworked shocks would be anywhere near (in the case of the S2000 AP2) an engine with changes included increased torque and lower redline? I just fail to see the comparison between the two. Please explain how the 86 will be toned down exactly? It sounds like it be stiffer and more rigid: " The most important update consists of a more rigid fixation of the front suspension and the rear shock absorbers. The increased rigidity is exploited by the reworked shock absorbers, which provide a more stable damping and improved friction control, with Toyota claiming they deliver smoother and more communicative handling."

Please correct me if I am not accurate?
Actually u r quite inaccurate and have not done your homework on the s2000 before u opened your mouth. Go do some home work and find ALL the changes honda made. Then u may understand what i meant. Also u dont know much about suspension tuning. Stiffer suspension doesnt mean better. Its about where and how much it is stiffened. By stiffening the front they dial in more understeer therefore decreasing the tail-happy nature of the 86. So, it becomes toned down for less skilled drivers like u.
Mixlplix is offline   Reply With Quote