View Single Post
Old 03-27-2012, 09:11 PM   #744
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Hey arghx7 if you see this, I was wondering about the thing you said about direct injection being very reliant on charge motion.

The 2GR-FSE paper has a chart that went something like "tumble ratio" vs. "flow coefficient", and they explained that they used a high flow port on the 2GR. From context, it seems like they're telling us the 2GR has high flow, low tumble ports. It has a little blurb about "consequently the tumble ratio of the high flow test engine was reduced by one third at the valve-lift divided by valve-diameter of 0.3".

Is this to say that the ports are still a compromise between tumble and flow? Is this why you were questioning the viability of increasing revs (intake port flow)?

Last edited by serialk11r; 03-27-2012 at 09:28 PM.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote