View Single Post
Old 04-10-2014, 11:41 AM   #211
andrew20195
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 321
Thanks: 154
Thanked 104 Times in 78 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjun View Post
And wouldn't straight pipe mess with back pressure?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportsguy83 View Post
For turbo, you want the LEAST amount of backpressure possible so removing the cat is actually a great thing.
For NA you also want the least amount of backpressure. It's all about pressure wave tuning, backpressure happens to be an undesirable side effect of pipe size in some (most? all?) applications.

With turbo you want essentially no exhaust behind the turbo (really a conical diffuser for best performance), with a good pressure differential across the turbine. That's why turbo cars usually run smaller exhaust runners than NA versions of the same displacement. In the particular case of our cars with stock header/PTuning turbo, there is likely a pressure drop across the catalyst, so it would make sense going to a catless header would improve performance. You ideally want the pressure drop across the turbine, not before it.
andrew20195 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to andrew20195 For This Useful Post:
bjun (04-10-2014), Sportsguy83 (04-10-2014)