Quote:
Originally Posted by HSayaovong
Wait, I can't seem grasp this... by apply change evenly across a section of the maf scaling table..wouldn't this create skewed and inaccurate result?
I.e reducing from 1.16v to 1.7v down .03 would have more of an impact on the lower voltage then on the lager one wouldn't it?
So by tackling each given voltage column and adjust each one to the ltft readout should yield greater accuracy shouldn't it?
Please advise. Thanks
|
An example, if you reduce every data point to 97% of it's original, the curve will remain the same shape but it will be smaller. The whole point of what I was trying to say is that the end result should ideally be a curve. Going and adjusting each point individually isn't the right way to do it.
Here's an example of what I mean, this is my S/C car on an earlier MAF revision. This is % change from stock scale:
You can see that it slowly increases. If that line was all over the place, which it would be if you did every point individually, then the MAF curve will be all jagged and not smooth which isn't ideal. There will always be some error, there are other ways to get around those once you start looking into it. Remember that MAF scaling is a starting point, not the way to cure everything.