View Single Post
Old 03-13-2014, 04:44 AM   #1626
ericmpena
Senior Member
 
ericmpena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,281
Thanks: 966
Thanked 538 Times in 319 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCStorm View Post
Anybody here run 18x8.75 +35 up front and 18x8.75 +20 for the rears? I just don't want the rears to sink in compared to the fronts and I'd prefer to avoid spacers if possible. Are there any downsides of running a lower offset in the rears versus the fronts? I usually see it the other way around
From what I've seen 18x8.75 +35 is flush in the rear. If you go to +20 they're going to stick out a good amount. +35 up front will poke out about 5mm, and +20 rear will poke out a lot more. You can see in the picture below.

If you want flush, then +35 in the rear is the way to go. The only problem with that is the rear will be flush, but the front will poke about 5mm. I know someone who has put a 5mm spacer in the rear just so the poke in the front and rear look similar.

Personally, I hate poke. I've decided to go with a 18x7.5 +38 for the front which is very flush from the pictures I've seen. For the rear I'm going with 18.8.75 +33 so that I'll have the same flushness both front and rear without any spacers. In order to avoid poke I needed to get a staggered setup, which I actually don't mind. I've found pictures of XXR 530's staggered and they look pretty good.

Here's a picture of 18x8.75 +35 in the rear. You can see how it's flush.
Name:  flush35offset.jpg
Views: 2625
Size:  249.3 KB

Here's a pic of 18x8.75 +20 in the rear. Tons of poke.
Name:  poke20offset.jpg
Views: 2941
Size:  675.6 KB
__________________

Last edited by ericmpena; 03-13-2014 at 05:01 AM.
ericmpena is offline   Reply With Quote