View Single Post
Old 03-09-2014, 01:25 PM   #216
Deslock
Senior Member
 
Deslock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 2013 DZE/01 (sold for MX5 ND1)
Location: western MA
Posts: 871
Thanks: 265
Thanked 269 Times in 133 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirBrass View Post
The RX8 actually had an unreliable engine which drank oil (rotary). Not the case here.
As I wrote, one of the FT86's advantages (that might help its longevity vs the RX8's) is that it:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deslock View Post
doesn't have a quirky engine (the 13B-MSP required too much attention for the masses)
Rotary owners have a saying, "A redline a day keeps the carbon away". Don't do that, and you risk carbon build up and eventual loss of compression. Don't follow the RX8's cold-engine shutdown procedure, and you risk flooding.

Also, oil consumption was a non-issue for owners who weren't idiots. I added a quart at 2k miles, changed the oil at 4k, added a quart at 6k, changed at 8k, etc.

Was it silly that a modern engine required that much TLC? Perhaps, but I wouldn't call the 13B-MSP unreliable.

Anyway, semantics aside, we agree... the FA20 is a more suitable motor for the masses, and hopefully the FT86's sales won't drop as quickly as the RX8's.
__________________
Deslock is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Deslock For This Useful Post:
imag (03-09-2014), zigzagz94 (03-09-2014)