View Single Post
Old 02-28-2014, 02:33 PM   #265
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,383
Thanks: 13,790
Thanked 9,502 Times in 5,013 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by regal View Post
Why is the era a factor when comparing cars, they become "used" the day you drive off the lot? A car is a car no matter when it was born.
I get your point, I just kinda went 'wtf' at your assertion:
Quote:
Originally Posted by regal View Post
This is not a low weight RWD car
Followed by comparing it to a car that was designed 20 years ago and a car that costs 2x as much. All I mean to say is that this is one of the lightest RWD cars you can buy built in the last decade. Hooray for crumple zones, side curtain airbags and a 6 speed gearbox!

If you really want to compare the Toyobaru in a bad light, look at the original 911S, adjusted for inflation comes in under $50k today, 180 hp from a 2.0L, under 2,300 lbs, four seats and of course RWD. That was nearly fifty years ago. My how far we've come? They complained about the power back then too talking about the gearing being bad for hills and having to downshift to pass on the highways and all the other garbage we still babble about today like the OEM tires...

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ad-test-review
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote