Quote:
Originally Posted by JuniorAWD
The dynodynamics being the lowest.
No matter what, at the end of the day all that will matter is the real world performance. You mess with numbers, you are only hurting yourself in the long run when your customers start to figure it out.
Jr
|
That certainly wasn't the case in the said article.
But it's true about fudging numbers - just had a BRZ come in between these posts on my Dynojet with 40WHP / 25WTQ LESS than the Dyno Dynamics run he has on file, so I'm not sure if there's any validity with ANY of our opinions at this point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Tut
That is all true and as long as you get your Dynojet run files from the dyno operator, then you can open them up in Winpep and easily see what SAE correction factors were entered into the file including elevation and temp.
|
I used to post SAE numbers here on the forum if your recall but when everyone went the way of STD, I just stuck with the expected "norm." Just like boost plots.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuniorAWD
Or they change the drum info, and your now making another 10-20% over a normal properly sized DJ. Few ways of doing shady shit with a dynojet..
|
I suppose, but it's not like you can't skew ANY of the numbers on ANY other dynos either. And based on the principle numbers, we're well within the norm, both in the article as well as with our bone stock baseline FRSs.
Cheers!
Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC